Hearing earlier about the nurse from Colorado, suspected of being exposed t the Emboli virus,(a contagious disease) seems to have transcended the disease. Being under suspicion, she was quarantined in New Jersey.
II
The very nature of the quarantine may be cause for celebration. But in this instance the 21 day period gives rise to the nurse hiring a legal eagle to argue the quarantine is suppressive..
A step forward may be a protocol for the welfare and survival of the species but for the nurse in this instance, doesn’t it compel a moment of personal discovery.
III
Anyone who is blessed with good health; not having fever and bodily functions in question, the nurse’s case for an invasion of her freedom to travel, without any limitations, may in some quarters be unconscionable That the protocol insures public safety; the virus from the invisible is cause for contendinghealth professionals overreacted.
IV
Where is there a reign of terror? Wasn’t Florence Nightingale a proponent of making humanity more human. Madame Curie going forward as a woman, raising the consciousness of herblood cultures
No one represses the nurse’s voice, repressing her “TyphoidMary” connotation. In weighing her sound in the chorale of dissenting voices in the cosmos , could it be interpreted as asound track short circuiting......
V
Those public health pros: their passionate protocols wherever: Dallas, D.C. New York, New Jersey, an armada of “diagnosis”from hospitals across the nation and West Africa, replicatingprotocols.
Quarantine is not a measure of imprisonment. Simply put an example of furthering the dialogue, the commitment of protocols, advancing the threshold of medicine to its highest….significant response where the public interest is threatened fromthe virus’s death dealing inevitability.
VI
“Doctor Livingston, I presume,” said Spencer Tracy as Stanley,discovering Sir Cedric Hardwicke in the West African underbrush.
October 29, 2014 The City that never sleeps
